Doris Wise Montrose

“Imagine if our right to speak, or to vote, depended on being assigned a favorable judge who’d issue us permits.” When it decides on NYSRPA v. Bruen—scheduled for oral arguments today—the Supreme Court will have a chance to stop governments from restricting the right to “bear arms.” The part of the Constitution guaranteeing that right has long

“If you’re watching the Rittenhouse trial, and you’re a gun owner, you are probably pulling your hair out every time the lefty prosecutor opens his annoying, 2nd Amendment-hating avocado toast hole.” If you’re watching the Rittenhouse trial, and you’re a gun owner, you are probably pulling your hair out every time the lefty prosecutor opens

“The defense team in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse requested a mistrial with prejudice, arguing that Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger had acted in bad faith during the trial and engaged in prosecutorial misconduct.” Kyle Rittenhouse is being persecuted. The defense team in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse requested a mistrial with prejudice, arguing that

Judge Bruce Schroeder rightly reprimanded Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger for what he called a “grave constitutional violation.” Kyle Rittenhouse is the star witness in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. And today the 18-year-old took the stand, testifying that he acted in self-defense when he shot three men, ultimately killing two, during unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin,

As if the constitution didn’t exist, every alphabet agency is working AGAINST We, the People. The Biden administration in just the past year alone stockpiled the records of more than 54 million U.S. gun owners and is poised to drastically alter gun regulations to ensure that information on Americans who own firearms ultimately ends up

“The issue that matters in court is the part where the armed Rittenhouse is chased, jumped, kicked in the head, knocked down, then set upon by a guy with a skateboard. He feared for his life and acted accordingly. Legal expert on self-defense law Andrew Branca says Rittenhouse didn’t know the motives of his attacker.

Gaige Grosskreutz was one of the attackers of Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha Wisconsin last year.  After giving testimony earlier today attempting to paint himself as a victim of Rittenhouse, the witness/attacker admitted today in during cross examination he was shot only after he threatened Rittenhouse by pointing a gun at him inches away from his head. While

“The defense also asked Grosskreutz if he saw Rittenhouse behaving in a threatening manner, raising his voice, pointing his gun at people, and Grosskreutz said that he did not.” The case should have been dismissed with prejudice at this point. During Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial on Tuesday, one of the men whom he shot that night,

“Based on the evidence thus far, the state should not be allowed to argue “provocation,” but that doesn’t mean it won’t try as the rest of its case collapses” Welcome to today’s Law of Self Defense ongoing coverage of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. I am, of course, Attorney Andrew Branca, for Law of Self Defense.

Moments before a fatal shooting on August 20, 2020, a masked Joseph Rosenbaum continued to chase down Kyle Rittenhouse despite the teen repeatedly yelling that he was “friendly,” Kenosha Police detective Martin Howard confirmed during testimony on Wednesday. Howard was reviewing never-before-seen FBI infrared aerial surveillance footage for the court when defense asked him about