Doris Wise Montrose

New York – -(AmmoLand.com)- At first glance, Wolford v. Lopez appears to present a narrow, technical dispute about firearms carried on private property open to the public. But appearances can be deceiving. As Attorney Roger J. Katz explains in his full legal analysis, the case before the U.S. Supreme Court is far more consequential—and potentially far more dangerous—than the

The Second Amendment is not a suggestion, not a privilege, and not a right that evaporates when lawmakers grow uncomfortable with armed citizens. As the Supreme Court prepares to hear Wolford v. Lopez, No. 24-1046, this case is about far more than Hawaii’s so-called “Vampire Rule.” It is about whether states—and the federal courts that enable

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court heard nearly two hours of argument Tuesday, January 20, 2026, in Wolford v. Lopez, a Second Amendment case that could decide whether states can make “no guns” the default rule for private property that’s open to the public—unless the owner gives express permission. At the center is a Hawaii law passed after New York State Rifle & Pistol

A bee does not waste its energy trying to convince a fly that honey is better than shit. I often see pro-gun rights posts get the same response: “You’re preaching to the choir. How do we reach the anti-gunners?” Here’s the truth: most anti-gunners aren’t interested in facts that would change their minds. Some arguments

The big takeaway is that you can’t win a confrontation with someone who has nothing to lose. When you decide to trade insults or posture back at an enraged person, you’re handing them the keys to your future. You might be “right” about the car accident, but being right doesn’t matter if you’re not around

You shouldn’t become a criminal because someone else committed a crime. Georgia’s bill stops local governments from punishing lawful gun owners after theft and restores statewide constitutional protections. The Georgia Senate on Tuesday passed its first bill of the session, which would ban local governments from requiring gun owners to lock their firearms in vehicles.

Hawaii’s modern gun-control narrative traces back to its monarchy and, in doing so underscores the very principle behind the Second Amendment. Firearms first entered the islands under Kamehameha the Great, who acquired them from foreigners and used them to conquer rival chiefs and consolidate power. Fully aware of the advantage weapons had given his dynasty,

Now they want the police to be disarmed and unarmed. Brady United claims to be an organization that is working to end “gun violence” in the country. A more accurate description of Brady, however, is a group working to end “gun ownership.” That’s been evident for decades, as the group used to be called Handgun

Hawaii cites King Kamehameha III’s 1833 law to show a long-standing local gun-control tradition, while opponents argue that pre‑U.S. monarchical laws are irrelevant to America’s constitutional tradition. HONOLULU (AP) — Hawaii’s gun laws, long among the strictest in the nation, will be the focus of arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday. The court is taking up

The DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel has issued a landmark opinion concluding that the federal ban on mailing handguns through the U.S. Postal Service is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, marking a major shift in how the federal government applies the Second Amendment. The Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel has officially