“The only winning strategy is to elect leaders that respect the Constitution and who will uphold the rights protected within and defend the freedom and liberty of all Americans,” Drammissi said. “November is fast approaching offering Americans their next opportunity to choose their leaders and the differences between the two sides could not be more stark, the choice could not be more clear.”
We’ve been covering quite extensively all of the temper tantrums that the progressives have been having lately. The NYSRPA v. Bruen decision was a kryptonite to the gun rights oppressors across the land. Much to the chagrin of the Democratic nannies in control in a few strongholds, the peasants are allowed to have their pitchforks. Writer and friend over on the left coast, Joe Drammissi, penned a succinct but informative update on where the current conflicts are with Bruen response laws. He brings us the information through the lens of California’s SB2.
Appropriately titled, “SB2 and the Attempted Assassination of Concealed Carry,” Drammissi sets the stage through sobering facts he’s said before. It’s not like we’re not all out here banging this same drum, because we are, it’s just that Drammissi, like me, comes from a liberal wasteland of progressive failures.
“It doesn’t always seem so, but America in general is very pro-Second Amendment (2A),” Drammissi opened with. “As we no longer, for the most part, have a free press populated with investigative journalists but rather have what amounts to a propaganda arm for the Democrat party, the reporting on this subject has a very strong anti-2A bias.”
By John Petrolino
