The Supreme Court did not say the government can’t keep guns away from dangerous people. It can still prosecute people who are intoxicated, genuinely dangerous, or whose drug use can be shown to make them a real risk. What the Court did say is that the government can’t simply strip away a constitutional right because
Read More
Second Amendment
Clarence Thomas Explains Why the Commerce Clause Cannot Justify Federal Bans on Gun Possession
The real significance of Justice Thomas’ concurrence isn’t just about gun rights—it’s about the constitutional limits on federal power. If Congress can regulate virtually anything merely because it once crossed a state line, then the Constitution’s system of limited, enumerated powers loses much of its meaning. This is a legally dense article, but it’s well
Read MoreI believe governments—regardless of party—are generally more comfortable with a population that is unarmed or whose arms are subject to government approval. That’s why the Constitution begins with “We the People,” not “We the Government.” The founders understood that liberty is not granted by government; government is granted its authority by the people. Therefore, We
Read More


