“We can either live in a paranoid politically correct world frantically trying not to offend the Hitlers and Mohammeds, and blaming their victims when they kill, or we can be free men and women who have chosen to take the power to defend our rights into our own hands.

While a thousand organizations use the Holocaust as a platform for speeches about tolerance, Children Of Jewish Holocaust Survivors [Jews Can Shoot] is conducting firearms training… Freedom is not defended with empty idealism easily perverted into appeasement of evil, but with the force of arms.”

Daniel Greenfield / Sultan Knish blog

All too many of the other great tragedies of history - Stalin's atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few - were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece... If a few hundred Jewish fighter in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars.

Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Silveira v. Lockyer, 2003

Habah l'hargecha hashkem l'hargo -- "If someone is coming to kill you, rise against him and kill him first."

Second Amendment

An Infuriating Argument in Favor of Gun Bans

by Doris Wise Montrose on September 13, 2025

Kirk warns the government is trying to twist the Second Amendment so it can never be properly defended. Instead of protecting firearms “in common use for lawful purposes,” they claim guns must be commonly used specifically for self-defense. That tiny distinction makes it impossible to prove and lets courts dodge the Constitution entirely.

William Kirk of Washington Gun Law recently broke down a troubling development in Colorado’s ongoing litigation over municipal “assault weapon” and magazine bans.

In Rocky Mountain Gun Owners v. Town of Superior, the defendants have filed a renewed motion for summary judgment, essentially asking the court to toss out the lawsuit without even moving forward to discovery or trial.

But as Kirk explains, the most alarming part isn’t the procedural move itself—it’s the dangerous legal reasoning behind it.

According to Kirk, the government is attempting to reframe the Second Amendment standard in a way that could make it nearly impossible to ever challenge a ban.

By Larry Z

Kennedy’s health commission leaves guns out of its 20-page report

Bus Stop Attack in Israel Shows Why Armed Citizens Save Lives

"All too many of the other great tragedies of history—Stalin’s atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few—were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided or mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece, as the Militia Act required here. ... If a few hundred Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful of weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars." — Silveira v Lockyer, (9th Cir. 2003) (Kozinski, J. dissenting.)