Setting the tax stamp to $0 is a meaningless political compromise, not a permanent win. Without removing silencers from the NFA altogether, the door remains open for future restrictions while leaving all the regulatory requirements.
On the rumors about companies undermining NFA reform.
We were going to write a detailed breakdown of what happened in Congress last week with NFA reform, but then Isaac Botkin made an excellent video about it that you should just watch instead:
The summary is that there were various bills under discussion to remove silencers and potentially other items from the NFA, then those bills got watered down to keep everything in the NFA but reduce the cost of a silencer tax stamp to $0. That will probably be the final draft that gets voted on (if it does ever get voted on), despite some chatter that the more comprehensive reforms are still under discussion.
The really explosive gossip is that silencer companies were lobbying behind the scenes to keep silencers in the NFA. Silencer Central put out a statement endorsing the Hearing Protection Act after social media glommed onto them for some reason as the culprits:
By Open Source Defense