“We can either live in a paranoid politically correct world frantically trying not to offend the Hitlers and Mohammeds, and blaming their victims when they kill, or we can be free men and women who have chosen to take the power to defend our rights into our own hands.

While a thousand organizations use the Holocaust as a platform for speeches about tolerance, Children Of Jewish Holocaust Survivors [Jews Can Shoot] is conducting firearms training… Freedom is not defended with empty idealism easily perverted into appeasement of evil, but with the force of arms.”

Daniel Greenfield / Sultan Knish blog

All too many of the other great tragedies of history - Stalin's atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few - were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece... If a few hundred Jewish fighter in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars.

Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Silveira v. Lockyer, 2003

Habah l'hargecha hashkem l'hargo -- "If someone is coming to kill you, rise against him and kill him first."

Second Amendment

DOJ Shifts Focus to Dangerous Criminals, Away From Gun Owners: A Win for 2A ~ VIDEO

by Doris Wise Montrose on February 23, 2025

A significant shift in federal law enforcement priorities is taking shape, and it’s good news for gun owners.

Attorney General Pam Bondi’s Department of Justice (DOJ) has made it clear: going forward, they will focus on truly dangerous criminals—not law-abiding citizens caught in the web of arbitrary gun laws. This move signals a return to a rational and constitutional approach to firearm regulations, reinforcing the principle that Americans can only be disarmed if they are found to be a violent danger to themselves or others after due process.

The Supreme Court’s Rahimi Ruling and Its Impact

The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Rahimi was a major milestone in this shift. While the defendant in that case lost his appeal, the ruling reaffirmed a crucial point: firearm restrictions must be based on a person being demonstrably dangerous, not on technical or arbitrary infractions of the law. Rahimi, after all, was found to have engaged in multiple acts of violence, including domestic abuse and shootings.

Ammoland Editors and Staff

Mexico Narco-Terrorism Corruption Continues as SCOTUS Review Draws Near

When a Hogg Starts Acting Like a Pig

"All too many of the other great tragedies of history—Stalin’s atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few—were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided or mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece, as the Militia Act required here. ... If a few hundred Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful of weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars." — Silveira v Lockyer, (9th Cir. 2003) (Kozinski, J. dissenting.)