Attorneys sparred over whether AR-15s should be considered “dangerous and unusual weapons” under Supreme Court precedent.
MANHATTAN (CN) — The Second Circuit heard arguments Wednesday in two cases from gun rights groups challenging Connecticut’s restrictions on AR-15 ownership, which tightened significantly after the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012.
Both suits target Connecticut officials over the state’s 2013 law titled An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety. The law included comprehensive gun reform in the wake of the Sandy Hook mass shooting, in which 20-year-old Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people at the elementary school using an AR-15-style rifle. Twenty of Lanza’s victims were between six and seven years old.
One of the cases came from the National Association for Gun Rights, a controversial gun advocacy group that describes itself as more conservative than the National Rifle Association. Connecticut Citizens Defense League and the Second Amendment Foundation, another gun rights groups, filed the other lawsuit.
By Erik Uebelacker