Once they establish that government can tell you how many rounds your magazine can hold, there is nothing to stop them from specifying the magic number. If they can set the limit at 10, why not 9? 8? 7? 6? 5? 4? 3? 2? 1?
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has moved to vacate the decision of a three judge panel that ruled California’s ban on the acquisition and possession of ammunition magazines that can hold more than ten rounds violated the Second Amendment, granting a motion to rehear the case with a broader pool of judges in an opinion released Thursday afternoon.
While on the surface this may look like bad news, it’s not unexpected. Virtually every pro-Second Amendment opinion coming out of the Ninth Circuit is reheard by an en banc panel, and plaintiffs in this case, known as Duncan vs. Becerra, have been waiting for months for the court to make official what everyone suspected; anti-gun judges on the court want a re-do in the hopes of overturning the decision.
The federal lawsuit was filed in 2017 by the California Rifle and Pistol Association — the state arm of the National Rifle Association — and five San Diego County residents.
By Cam Edwards