So reads a headline at the Blaze, though a more precise formulation would have been “Man who shot neighbor to prevent him from drowning children will not face charges.” Be warned: Shooting someone for his crime, in the sense of in retaliation for the crime, is itself criminal (though it will often lead to a lesser sentence than when no such provocation is present). But shooting someone when necessary to preventdeath or serious injury to others is lawful, indeed laudable — it’s called “defense of others,” though it’s often spoken of together with self-defense, and the rules are nearly identical to the rules for self-defense.
Here are the facts as reported by the local prosecutor, from to KFOR-TV (K. Querry) (paragraph break added):
On Thursday, the Pontotoc County District Attorney announced that the shooting was a “justifiable use of deadly force under Oklahoma Law.”
The investigative report states that the mother of the children credited Freeman with saving their lives, saying, “the neighbor saved their life and that she was glad that he did or they would have all been dead… [Leland Foster, the babies’ father,] was going to drown the babies and the knife was meant for her.”
by Eugene Volokh
