“We can either live in a paranoid politically correct world frantically trying not to offend the Hitlers and Mohammeds, and blaming their victims when they kill, or we can be free men and women who have chosen to take the power to defend our rights into our own hands.

While a thousand organizations use the Holocaust as a platform for speeches about tolerance, Children Of Jewish Holocaust Survivors [Jews Can Shoot] is conducting firearms training… Freedom is not defended with empty idealism easily perverted into appeasement of evil, but with the force of arms.”

Daniel Greenfield / Sultan Knish blog

All too many of the other great tragedies of history - Stalin's atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few - were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece... If a few hundred Jewish fighter in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars.

Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Silveira v. Lockyer, 2003

Habah l'hargecha hashkem l'hargo -- "If someone is coming to kill you, rise against him and kill him first."

Facebook Friends Speak

If she desires the same rights as guns…

by Jews Can Shoot on May 27, 2017

Well now, if she desires the same rights as guns, then the woman holding that sign would be banned from:
· Any establishment selling alcohol.
· Polling places on election days.
· Any official government group meetings.
· From all airports or flying.
· All federal buildings, including post offices.
· All banks, schools, and college campuses.
· Many restaurants and shopping malls.
· Chicago, New York City, Washington, D.C., and many other cities.

Plus:
· A fee would need to be paid to the state before one could carry a woman.
· Some women would be banned outright simply because of certain “features” or looked too scary. (Nancy Pelosi?)
· All women would be locked up at all times when not in use. If she’s short or quiet, there would be a $200 ($5 for oddities) tax stamp, fingerprint cards, passport photos, and a federal background check.
· Some states would require her to travel in the trunk.
· Some states would control how much food you can feed her.
· California and Illinois would require a background check whenever food is bought for her.
· She could be bought and sold, with an FBI background check and waiting period.
· She could be demonized and attacked for being who she is or even worse yet, being black.
· There would be unceasing outcries to outright ban women.
· Men could have more than one.

by Penny Alfonso

via Facebook

SHOCKING: UK Police Refused To Help Jewish Family Under Attack By Anti-Semitic Stone Throwers

Allhands: Is this really a 'weapon of war?'

"All too many of the other great tragedies of history—Stalin’s atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few—were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided or mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece, as the Militia Act required here. ... If a few hundred Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful of weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars." — Silveira v Lockyer, (9th Cir. 2003) (Kozinski, J. dissenting.)