Repealing the federal school gun‑free zones law isn’t a priority for most Republican legislators because it’s not broadly popular with voters (especially parents), it’s politically sensitive, it has limited legislative support, and it doesn’t clearly win many votes.
Apparently, keeping schools ‘gun-free’ is just too controversial to mess with.
There’s clearly an ideological conflict between those who want to afford people the ability to defend themselves in public by banning gun-free zones and those who, regardless of the number of killings that occur in gun-free zones, want to keep people disarmed to prove their political point.
Thomas is a devoted father, lawful gun owner, and well-respected member of his community. Every morning, as he drives his daughter to school, his anxiety level reaches its pinnacle. The school is a gun-free zone, and he knows that if danger were to strike, there would be no one inside able to protect his daughter. The thought weighs on him heavily, a constant shadow over the simple act of dropping her off at school.
Every day, he tries to push the fear aside, as he walks her to the door unarmed. But the anxiety never fully leaves him. Thomas believes in responsibility, in lawfulness, and in the value of life. He also believes the current gun free school zones policies unnecessarily put his daughter at risk.
By Dan Wos

