“We can either live in a paranoid politically correct world frantically trying not to offend the Hitlers and Mohammeds, and blaming their victims when they kill, or we can be free men and women who have chosen to take the power to defend our rights into our own hands.

While a thousand organizations use the Holocaust as a platform for speeches about tolerance, Children Of Jewish Holocaust Survivors [Jews Can Shoot] is conducting firearms training… Freedom is not defended with empty idealism easily perverted into appeasement of evil, but with the force of arms.”

Daniel Greenfield / Sultan Knish blog

All too many of the other great tragedies of history - Stalin's atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few - were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece... If a few hundred Jewish fighter in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars.

Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Silveira v. Lockyer, 2003

Habah l'hargecha hashkem l'hargo -- "If someone is coming to kill you, rise against him and kill him first."

Second Amendment

Winner in California Open Carry Lawsuit seeks to Vacate the win and have it reheard en banc.

by Doris Wise Montrose on January 20, 2026

The lawyer who “won” California open carry is now trying to kill the ruling.

On the last day to file a petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc, both the California attorney general and the attorney for Mark Baird filed petitions for rehearing/rehearing en banc.

The petition by Attorney General Bonta was expected. It would have been a surprise if he did not file the petition, but the petition by Mark Baird’s attorney caught everyone offguard.

Whatever slim chance there might have been that AG Bonta’s petition would have been denied is gone. The 2-1 victory for the right to openly carry firearms in public will be vacated, and the case reheard before an en banc panel, a panel of judges more hostile to the Second Amendment than the three-judge panel with its lone judge who would ban Open Carry.

I get teased by some for fixating on Federal procedural law*, but it is important to note that the worst part of the Baird v. Bonta majority opinion, and the en banc petition by Mark Baird’s attorney, is California’s licensing scheme.

By Charles Nichols

Why Rabbis Must Teach the Moral Case for Jewish Self-Defense

Democrats Show Willingness to Tax 2A Rights 2354% While Republicans Sit Idly By

SUPPORT THE WORK OF JEWS CAN SHOOT

Antisemitism is increasing. So are efforts to restrict fundamental rights. Are you paying attention to how—and why?

Antisemitic incidents are rising across political and ideological lines. The resulting violence is no longer sporadic or abstract; it is a recurring reality confronting Jewish communities with growing frequency.

At the same time, attempts to limit the right to keep and bear arms continue unabated. These efforts are not confined to moments of crisis or tied to any single administration. They represent a long-term, coordinated push that advances regardless of who holds power.

Jews Can Shoot operates where these two trends intersect.

I document and analyze antisemitism and gun control together, over time and in context. Too often, these issues are reported in isolation—treated as disconnected events rather than parts of a broader pattern. Our work focuses on continuity, not headlines.

History is instructive. Measures first justified as “necessary” for Jews have a way of becoming precedents applied far more broadly. Cultural narratives, legal arguments, and policy frameworks rarely stop with their initial targets.

The weekly newsletter provides readers with accurate, well-sourced information to help identify these patterns as they emerge—not after they are entrenched.

This work requires consistent research, monitoring, and editorial effort.

If you value informed vigilance over complacency, I ask for your support.

A one-time or monthly contribution helps ensure that this radar stays on—and independent.

Don’t be a spectator to your own disarmament.