As the Supreme Court prepares to hear Mexico’s lawsuit against U.S. gun manufacturers on March 4, the battle over who is responsible for cartel violence is intensifying. Gun-control advocates, Mexico’s government and even California’s attorney general are siding with Mexico, arguing that American firearms are the cause of the bloodshed. Meanwhile, pro-Second Amendment voices, including the NRA, have countered this claim with hard facts, exposing the deeper realities of cartel armament and corruption.
Some of Mexico City’s ire stems from the Trump administration’s move to designate several cartels as “foreign terrorist organizations.” But rather than fix the problem, politicians and their U.S. supporters want to blame the legal gun industry north of the border.
Mexico’s argument rests on the idea that U.S. gun manufacturers negligently supply firearms to cartels, making them complicit in the violence. But this claim is a smokescreen—an attempt to shift the blame away from Mexico’s rampant corruption, its own military’s suspected role in arming cartels and the Mexican government’s inability to curb the influence of these criminal organizations.
By Susanne Edward